The "Politics of Loneliness":
Demasculinizing Narratives of Russian Sovereigntism
Demasculinizing Narratives of Russian Sovereigntism
This research project analyses how Russian political discourse connects masculinity/femininity with macro and micro levels of loneliness to legitimize ‘Great Russia’ nationalism through masculine “politics of loneliness”. “Politics of loneliness” will refer to forms of politicization of human loneliness, and more specifically existential ‘loneliness anxiety’, for the purposes of building legitimacy for a particular collective identity and preservation of its ontological insecurity.
The research problem then could be formulated as follows: Modern Russian sovereignitism and nationalism can be significantly legitimized and fuelled through silenced masculinity and ‘loneliness anxiety’; their impact can be identified through a more systematic analysis of domestic, foreign, and transnational dimensions of Russian affairs and political discourse.
At the heart of my project lies the following research question: Why and to what extent do notions of ‘masculinity’ and ‘loneliness anxiety’ contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian sovereignitism and gendered nationalism in domestic and foreign affairs. This research is not about a monocausal argument. The framing of this question suggests that, besides masculinity and loneliness anxiety, there can be other factors that contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian nationalistic sovereigntism. However, I will concentrate on the research goal to look at the ideological discourse of sovereigntism as a tool for patterning difference and domination through the management of masculine loneliness anxieties in modern Russian society.
Here, not only do I contend that states can talk on behalf of their people when state discourse on sovereignty directly or implicitly appeals to a nationally or civilizationally defined ‘loneliness anxiety’ of the people. Moreover, in societies like Russia, dominated by the ‘male gaze’ on politics, the exploitation of loneliness anxiety leads to sovereigntism becoming a ‘masculine organized loneliness’.
This project will start with 1) outlining the psychological research on loneliness and then 2) unpack how this relates to political theory and international relations. 3) I will explain the link between ‘loneliness' and “nationalist sovereigntism’ and 4) justify the choice of Russia as a case. I will proceed to explaining why demasculinization of narratives of Russian sovereigntism is impossible without analysis of silenced “gendered nationalism” dimension of “politics of loneliness” in Russia. Lastly, I will juxtapose and compare Russian “gendered nationalism”, “vertical” politics of loneliness with “horizontal”, transnational practices of managing loneliness by “Global Russians” on a micro level, thereby demasculinizing the former.
Generalizability and research output. The results of the project and on-line survey will be presented at http://odinochestva.net/. The latter web platform will be used for development of Politics of Loneliness & Solitude (PoLS) Lab in the future. Among the main goals of PoLS I see four following:
1) political theory demarcation between conformist loneliness anxiety and creative solitude (known in existential psychology as division between “loneliness” vs “solitude”);
2) comparative politics feminism and transnationalism-based empirical deconstruction of vertical, nationalist and masculine modes of the politics of loneliness, which are often based on collective narcissism, intergenerational trauma and phallocentric positionalities;
3) development of epistemology and methodology for the analysis politics of loneliness, for example, study of political loneliness emotions through their visual representations (street posters, cinematography, mental maps etc.);
4) discovering new philosophical and anthropological avenues for self-actualization of individual (Abraham Maslow) through transcultural dialogue and transcendental ‘life knowledge’ (Semen Frank). Opening of our “odinochestva” (Russian word for “solitudes”) to shelter “strangers” (Albert Camus), and to co-exist “in solitude, where we are least alone” (Lord Byron).
Therefore, Politics of Loneliness & Solitude Lab is aimed to accommodate multidisciplinary research program at the intersection of existentialism, feminism, and visual political anthropology.
The research problem then could be formulated as follows: Modern Russian sovereignitism and nationalism can be significantly legitimized and fuelled through silenced masculinity and ‘loneliness anxiety’; their impact can be identified through a more systematic analysis of domestic, foreign, and transnational dimensions of Russian affairs and political discourse.
At the heart of my project lies the following research question: Why and to what extent do notions of ‘masculinity’ and ‘loneliness anxiety’ contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian sovereignitism and gendered nationalism in domestic and foreign affairs. This research is not about a monocausal argument. The framing of this question suggests that, besides masculinity and loneliness anxiety, there can be other factors that contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian nationalistic sovereigntism. However, I will concentrate on the research goal to look at the ideological discourse of sovereigntism as a tool for patterning difference and domination through the management of masculine loneliness anxieties in modern Russian society.
Here, not only do I contend that states can talk on behalf of their people when state discourse on sovereignty directly or implicitly appeals to a nationally or civilizationally defined ‘loneliness anxiety’ of the people. Moreover, in societies like Russia, dominated by the ‘male gaze’ on politics, the exploitation of loneliness anxiety leads to sovereigntism becoming a ‘masculine organized loneliness’.
This project will start with 1) outlining the psychological research on loneliness and then 2) unpack how this relates to political theory and international relations. 3) I will explain the link between ‘loneliness' and “nationalist sovereigntism’ and 4) justify the choice of Russia as a case. I will proceed to explaining why demasculinization of narratives of Russian sovereigntism is impossible without analysis of silenced “gendered nationalism” dimension of “politics of loneliness” in Russia. Lastly, I will juxtapose and compare Russian “gendered nationalism”, “vertical” politics of loneliness with “horizontal”, transnational practices of managing loneliness by “Global Russians” on a micro level, thereby demasculinizing the former.
Generalizability and research output. The results of the project and on-line survey will be presented at http://odinochestva.net/. The latter web platform will be used for development of Politics of Loneliness & Solitude (PoLS) Lab in the future. Among the main goals of PoLS I see four following:
1) political theory demarcation between conformist loneliness anxiety and creative solitude (known in existential psychology as division between “loneliness” vs “solitude”);
2) comparative politics feminism and transnationalism-based empirical deconstruction of vertical, nationalist and masculine modes of the politics of loneliness, which are often based on collective narcissism, intergenerational trauma and phallocentric positionalities;
3) development of epistemology and methodology for the analysis politics of loneliness, for example, study of political loneliness emotions through their visual representations (street posters, cinematography, mental maps etc.);
4) discovering new philosophical and anthropological avenues for self-actualization of individual (Abraham Maslow) through transcultural dialogue and transcendental ‘life knowledge’ (Semen Frank). Opening of our “odinochestva” (Russian word for “solitudes”) to shelter “strangers” (Albert Camus), and to co-exist “in solitude, where we are least alone” (Lord Byron).
Therefore, Politics of Loneliness & Solitude Lab is aimed to accommodate multidisciplinary research program at the intersection of existentialism, feminism, and visual political anthropology.
More on that see, for example:
- Akopov Sergei. ‘When women speak phallocentric positionalities: biopolitics of feminine loneliness in Russian cinemascape,’ Visual Anthropology (forthcoming, 2023). DOI: 10.1080/08949468.2023.2208480.
- Vera Ageeva & Sergei Akopov. 2022. ‘Global Russians’: A Case Study of Transnational Actors in World Politics, Europe-Asia Studies, 74:8, 1325-1349
- Akopov, Sergei. 2021. Sovereignty as ‘organized loneliness’: an existential approach to the sovereigntism of Russian ‘state-civilization’, Journal of Political Ideologies, October 25, DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2021.1990560
- Akopov, Sergei. 2021. Obshchestvennyj ideal: «ontologicheskaya bezopasnost'» i «politika odinochestva», [Social ideal: ontological security and politics of loneliness] Chelovek. (32:4), 5-26.
- Akopov, Sergei. 2021. ‘Sovereignty’ and ‘Intervention’ Metaphors of Russia’s Loneliness in a Global World, in: Envisioning the World: Mapping and Making the Global. Ed. by M. Albert, S. Holtgreve, K. Preuß. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 145-164.
- Akopov, Sergei. 2020. Russia’s ‘fortresses of solitude’: Social imaginaries of loneliness after the fall of the USSR. Social Science Information. Vol. 59. No. 2, 288-309.
This research project analyses how Russian political discourse connects masculinity/femininity with macro and micro levels of loneliness to legitimize ‘Great Russia’ nationalism through masculine “politics of loneliness”. “Politics of loneliness” will refer to forms of politicization of human loneliness, and more specifically existential ‘loneliness anxiety’, for the purposes of building legitimacy for a particular collective identity and preservation of its ontological insecurity.
The research problem then could be formulated as follows: Modern Russian sovereignitism and nationalism can be significantly legitimized and fuelled through silenced masculinity and ‘loneliness anxiety’; their impact can be identified through a more systematic analysis of domestic, foreign, and transnational dimensions of Russian affairs and political discourse.
At the heart of my project lies the following research question: Why and to what extent do notions of ‘masculinity’ and ‘loneliness anxiety’ contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian sovereignitism and gendered nationalism in domestic and foreign affairs. This research is not about a monocausal argument. The framing of this question suggests that, besides masculinity and loneliness anxiety, there can be other factors that contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian nationalistic sovereigntism. However, I will concentrate on the research goal to look at the ideological discourse of sovereigntism as a tool for patterning difference and domination through the management of masculine loneliness anxieties in modern Russian society.
Here, not only do I contend that states can talk on behalf of their people when state discourse on sovereignty directly or implicitly appeals to a nationally or civilizationally defined ‘loneliness anxiety’ of the people. Moreover, in societies like Russia, dominated by the ‘male gaze’ on politics, the exploitation of loneliness anxiety leads to sovereigntism becoming a ‘masculine organized loneliness’.
This project will start with 1) outlining the psychological research on loneliness and then 2) unpack how this relates to political theory and international relations. 3) I will explain the link between ‘loneliness' and “nationalist sovereigntism’ and 4) justify the choice of Russia as a case. I will proceed to explaining why demasculinization of narratives of Russian sovereigntism is impossible without analysis of silenced “gendered nationalism” dimension of “politics of loneliness” in Russia. Lastly, I will juxtapose and compare Russian “gendered nationalism”, “vertical” politics of loneliness with “horizontal”, transnational practices of managing loneliness by “Global Russians” on a micro level, thereby demasculinizing the former.
Generalizability and research output. The results of the project and on-line survey will be presented at http://odinochestva.net/. The latter web platform will be used for development of Politics of Loneliness & Solitude (PoLS) Lab in the future. Among the main goals of PoLS I see four following:
1) political theory demarcation between conformist loneliness anxiety and creative solitude (known in existential psychology as division between “loneliness” vs “solitude”);
2) comparative politics feminism and transnationalism-based empirical deconstruction of vertical, nationalist and masculine modes of the politics of loneliness, which are often based on collective narcissism, intergenerational trauma and phallocentric positionalities;
3) development of epistemology and methodology for the analysis politics of loneliness, for example, study of political loneliness emotions through their visual representations (street posters, cinematography, mental maps etc.);
4) discovering new philosophical and anthropological avenues for self-actualization of individual (Abraham Maslow) through transcultural dialogue and transcendental ‘life knowledge’ (Semen Frank). Opening of our “odinochestva” (Russian word for “solitudes”) to shelter “strangers” (Albert Camus), and to co-exist “in solitude, where we are least alone” (Lord Byron).
Therefore, Politics of Loneliness & Solitude Lab is aimed to accommodate multidisciplinary research program at the intersection of existentialism, feminism, and visual political anthropology.
The research problem then could be formulated as follows: Modern Russian sovereignitism and nationalism can be significantly legitimized and fuelled through silenced masculinity and ‘loneliness anxiety’; their impact can be identified through a more systematic analysis of domestic, foreign, and transnational dimensions of Russian affairs and political discourse.
At the heart of my project lies the following research question: Why and to what extent do notions of ‘masculinity’ and ‘loneliness anxiety’ contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian sovereignitism and gendered nationalism in domestic and foreign affairs. This research is not about a monocausal argument. The framing of this question suggests that, besides masculinity and loneliness anxiety, there can be other factors that contribute to explaining the legitimization of Russian nationalistic sovereigntism. However, I will concentrate on the research goal to look at the ideological discourse of sovereigntism as a tool for patterning difference and domination through the management of masculine loneliness anxieties in modern Russian society.
Here, not only do I contend that states can talk on behalf of their people when state discourse on sovereignty directly or implicitly appeals to a nationally or civilizationally defined ‘loneliness anxiety’ of the people. Moreover, in societies like Russia, dominated by the ‘male gaze’ on politics, the exploitation of loneliness anxiety leads to sovereigntism becoming a ‘masculine organized loneliness’.
This project will start with 1) outlining the psychological research on loneliness and then 2) unpack how this relates to political theory and international relations. 3) I will explain the link between ‘loneliness' and “nationalist sovereigntism’ and 4) justify the choice of Russia as a case. I will proceed to explaining why demasculinization of narratives of Russian sovereigntism is impossible without analysis of silenced “gendered nationalism” dimension of “politics of loneliness” in Russia. Lastly, I will juxtapose and compare Russian “gendered nationalism”, “vertical” politics of loneliness with “horizontal”, transnational practices of managing loneliness by “Global Russians” on a micro level, thereby demasculinizing the former.
Generalizability and research output. The results of the project and on-line survey will be presented at http://odinochestva.net/. The latter web platform will be used for development of Politics of Loneliness & Solitude (PoLS) Lab in the future. Among the main goals of PoLS I see four following:
1) political theory demarcation between conformist loneliness anxiety and creative solitude (known in existential psychology as division between “loneliness” vs “solitude”);
2) comparative politics feminism and transnationalism-based empirical deconstruction of vertical, nationalist and masculine modes of the politics of loneliness, which are often based on collective narcissism, intergenerational trauma and phallocentric positionalities;
3) development of epistemology and methodology for the analysis politics of loneliness, for example, study of political loneliness emotions through their visual representations (street posters, cinematography, mental maps etc.);
4) discovering new philosophical and anthropological avenues for self-actualization of individual (Abraham Maslow) through transcultural dialogue and transcendental ‘life knowledge’ (Semen Frank). Opening of our “odinochestva” (Russian word for “solitudes”) to shelter “strangers” (Albert Camus), and to co-exist “in solitude, where we are least alone” (Lord Byron).
Therefore, Politics of Loneliness & Solitude Lab is aimed to accommodate multidisciplinary research program at the intersection of existentialism, feminism, and visual political anthropology.
More on that see, for example:
- Akopov Sergei. ‘When women speak phallocentric positionalities: biopolitics of feminine loneliness in Russian cinemascape,’ Visual Anthropology (forthcoming, 2023). DOI: 10.1080/08949468.2023.2208480.
- Vera Ageeva & Sergei Akopov. 2022. ‘Global Russians’: A Case Study of Transnational Actors in World Politics, Europe-Asia Studies, 74:8, 1325-1349
- Akopov, Sergei. 2021. Sovereignty as ‘organized loneliness’: an existential approach to the sovereigntism of Russian ‘state-civilization’, Journal of Political Ideologies, October 25, DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2021.1990560
- Akopov, Sergei. 2021. Obshchestvennyj ideal: «ontologicheskaya bezopasnost'» i «politika odinochestva», [Social ideal: ontological security and politics of loneliness] Chelovek. (32:4), 5-26.
- Akopov, Sergei. 2021. ‘Sovereignty’ and ‘Intervention’ Metaphors of Russia’s Loneliness in a Global World, in: Envisioning the World: Mapping and Making the Global. Ed. by M. Albert, S. Holtgreve, K. Preuß. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 145-164.
- Akopov, Sergei. 2020. Russia’s ‘fortresses of solitude’: Social imaginaries of loneliness after the fall of the USSR. Social Science Information. Vol. 59. No. 2, 288-309.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
No, we do not have a political agenda, or engage in political campaigning. The objectives of our professional, non-profit association are to assist our emigrated colleagues and to conduct joint research with scholars around the world.
As you can see from the list of the projects of our association, the scope of our research is quite broad: from historical studies that shed light on the origins of current events to interdisciplinary research in political philosophy and political theory, epistemology and sociology, bioethics and medical humanities, philosophy of science and many others.
There are no restrictions. We welcome the participation of colleagues from any country.
We conduct our activities in various languages, mainly French, Russian and English.
No, IPHI was created as an international association with the objective of cooperation between researchers from different countries. IPHI will carry out projects that touch on all areas of humanities and social sciences. The association brings together researchers from different countries. The main languages of IPHI research projects are French, Russian, English and German, but other languages are also possible.
No, it is not obligatory. Everyone is free to choose whether or not to make information about themselves public. However, for those planning to publish descriptions of their projects on our website, their name is required, as our projects are not anonymous.
We welcome participation in our events and projects and are always open to new proposals. At the same time, we do not oblige members to participate; it is their voluntary decision.
We will be delighted to hear from Ukrainian colleagues who wish to join our projects and events. We treasure the cooperation and the opportunity to look at topical issues from different angles.
We cooperate with colleagues in Russia. However, we do not publish information about them on our website to avoid exposing them to additional risks.
In the future, we will prepare separate pages in the respective languages for projects concerning Ukraine, Belarus and other countries.
Join the association
We welcome you to join the Independent Institute of Philosophy Association if you share our values of liberty, oppose Russia's invasion of Ukraine, are eager to promote the development of critical philosophical thought, and are open to international collaboration in the social sciences and humanities.
Support freedom of research
Support freedom of research
And access to knowledge for all by donating to the Independent Institute of Philosophy.
